Mario Profaca isn't your everyday sort of guy. He's done a lot. Seen a lot. Been around a lot. Some people might think his word is the truth. Others might think of him as a keyboard guerrilla.
Born in Croatia, in 1940, Profaca is actually a professional journalist. He has been one since the age of 20, has covered nine wars, was wounded in the battle for Paxe Bridge, Bangladesh, and received the Medal of Merits for Nation (1963) from the then Yugoslavian President Tito for being one of first journalists to arrive in Skopje after an earthquake (he carried five boxes of blood plasma). It's not what he does in the real world that attracts us though. It's his virtual stuff -- Mario's Cyberspace Station (The Global Intelligence News Portal) -- that does.
His site goes against conventionality. It concentrates on under-reported news, forgotten scams, spy stories, guerrilla warfare and what not. In its creator's words, "
[ ... ]
Is the site truly a one-man effort?
Yes, this is really a one-man site. I use WYSWIM -- What You See Is What I Made, down to every line of code. I know there are excellent content editors, but I prefer being a sort of Internet Sinatra, doing things 'My Way'. No help needed. I even cook my coffee by myself.
What draws you to the world of spies, wars and guerrilla warfare?
You could ask the same question to millions of my visitors, too. Almost all of them come by submitting the key word 'intelligence' to their search engines.
It is said that the CIA drops by frequently. Does that scare you?
There are thousands of visitors from intelligence communities of many countries worldwide. I don't see anything scary about it. What's more, according to feedback, they all appreciate my work and consider it a great help.
What kind of feedback do you get? Any threats?
No threats at all. Though, at times, I think that isn't a good sign.
Are you happy you made the switch from a reporter on the frontline to the man behind Mario's Cyberspace?
There was neither a transformation nor a switch, and that is what I am happy about. I was always the same: a journalist who knew how to use all means of communication and media. While reporting from the frontlines, I used phone, telex, fax, email and even amateur ham radio. I now have a DSL connection to the Internet and, by 2040 (when I will be only a hundred years old), I hope to have a satellite videophone! I think that's what makes one a good journalist, if I may flatter myself that way. I don't know why some journalists are calling themselves 'investigative reporters'. What is journalism without investigative research anyway? Particularly today, with all sources and resources just a click away.
[ ... ]
What do you think of the recent trend towards embedding journalists?
There were always journalists who would agree to serve as propaganda tool or as undercover intelligence agents sincerely believing they are honourably serving their homeland in need. Somebody called it "patriotic journalism", but I think it is not journalism.
Promotion of "embedded journalism" means just the institutionalisation of their work for Pentagon or CIA, whatever, in public, what some of them maybe willing to do in secret. (Take a look at my web pages CIA: Use of journalists.) But, I don't blame them. I can imagine what would happen to their career if some of them declined the assignment. All wars have their heroes but you can't blame anybody for not being one. That is just what makes human beings and their characters so different from each other. That is what makes the difference between journalists killed in Hotel Palestine in Baghdad and those who will, thank God and Pentagon, safely return to their families back in USA together with the US army units they were embedded with. But I think those second ones should be saluted as brave soldiers, not journalists.
Does your site have a political agenda? Or do you try and represent all views through the links you provide?
I am not sure whether one could call it a political agenda or not. I am just trying to help visitors get usually under-reported news and sources so that they can go for a news coverage comparison. But I would never suggest what "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth" is. I do believe the average visitor is capable of drawing his or her own conclusions. I hope I'm helping them create their own criteria for judging who is who or what really happened.
Why don't you accept advertisements on your site?
My opinion about online advertisements is that too many of them could suffocate a Web site and scatter visitors. The main reason why I don't have advertising is because my Web hosts gave me a lot of space on their servers free, for my home site in Croatia and mirrors in Holland and the US, so I can't use it for commercial purposes. I hope somebody may grant me 60 MB ad-free space somewhere in Asia too, as I have a lot of visitors from your part of the world. But I'm afraid I'm just the last Web romantic in cyberspace...
..
~ full article ~
No comments:
Post a Comment