From the Alliance of Community Trainers, ACT
 The Occupy movement has had enormous successes in the short time  since September when activists took over a square near Wall Street. It  has attracted hundreds of thousands of active participants, spawned  occupations in cities and towns all over North America, changed the  national dialogue and garnered enormous public support. It’s even, on  occasion, gotten good press!
 Now we are wrestling with the question that arises again and again in  movements for social justice—how to struggle. Do we embrace  nonviolence, or a ‘diversity of tactics?’ If we are a nonviolent  movement, how do we define nonviolence? Is breaking a window violent?
 We write as a trainers’ collective with decades of experience, from  the anti-Vietnam protests of the sixties through the strictly nonviolent  antinuclear blockades of the seventies, in feminist, environmental and  anti-intervention movements and the global justice mobilizations of the  late ‘90s and early ‘00s. We embrace many labels, including feminist,  anti-racist, eco-feminist and anarchist. We have many times stood  shoulder to shoulder with black blocs in the face of the riot cops, and  we’ve been tear-gassed, stun-gunned, pepper sprayed, clubbed, and  arrested,
 While we’ve participated in many actions organized with a diversity  of tactics, we do not believe that framework is workable for the Occupy  Movement. Setting aside questions of morality or definitions of  ‘violence’ and ‘nonviolence’ – for no two people define ‘violence’ in  the same way – we ask the question:
 What framework can we organize in that will build  on our strengths, allow us to grow, embrace a wide diversity of  participants, and make a powerful impact on the world?
>> more... >>
The Tactic of Occupation & the Movement of the 99%
If we are to launch from a moment to a movement, we will have to broaden  the “us”. We must win in the arena of values, and not allow ourselves  to be narrowly defined by our tactics.