Barack Obama's presidential candidacy does nothing to stop the Black community's pain and suffering at the hands of those conducting genocide under the guise of "public health" and "national security."
This topic should be headlining news internationally, but it's not. The censorship is indicative of the conspiracy of silence that evidences the complicity of the mainstream media's hypocrisy.
The taboo subject is especially relevant to Ron Paul supporters who, unlike Ron Paul, contend the news media has been covering up medical genocide as evidenced in Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola--Nature, Accident or Intentional?, by this author. The book was recommended by Barack Obama's ex-minister, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, on national television with CNN later canceling a prepared segment on the science of the hepatitis B vaccine transmission of HIV to New York's gay and African Black communities.
Instead of following the good pastor's advice, the mainstream media remains bent on spinning or censoring genocide as though the entire topic is a fake or far-fetched.
Classic grist for this rumor mill is the Washington Post's coverage of National Security Memorandum 46.
Casey Lartigue Jr., an education consultant based in Virginia, and Eliot Morgan, a graduate student in environmental science at Harvard University, wrote this article claiming that "one-third of black American churchgoers believed that AIDS was a form of genocide. One-third also believed that HIV was produced in a germ-warfare lab, and 40 percent of black college students in Washington, D.C., agreed."
Real science teaches that Lartique and Morgan's numbers are under-reported. By 1997, more than 60 percent of urban Blacks believed AIDS to be racially-targeted genocide.
Why would The Washington Post lie?
"The Company" is a mouthpiece for the CIA which takes its multinational corporate direction from globalists in London and Berlin. The Washington Post, and the Associated Press, are among the top Anglo-American news (propaganda) sources in the "free world."
Notice, in their article, they cited nothing about the absolutely compelling and condemning evidence on the laboratory creation and vaccine transmission of HIV/AIDS published in Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola--Nature, Accident or Intentional?
Notice they wrote nothing about National Security Memorandum 200 by Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski's counterpart in the Nixon White House, that equally condemns and concerns colored people as targets for genocidal elimination.
Notice they said nothing about George HW Bush standing before Congress in 1968 urging third world, mostly Black, depopulation to allegedly respond to a "U.S. National Security" crisis.
Notice they did not reveal granddaddy Prescott Bush's heavy investment in eugenics, later named "racial hygiene," advanced by the first family's Nazi collaborators (i.e., Rockefeller-Schmitz Standard Oil/IG Farben industrialists).
Notice they failed to detail COINTELPRO under J. Edgar Hoover that specifically targeted Black leaders and organized activists as further detailed in NSM 46.
This topic should be headlining news internationally, but it's not. The censorship is indicative of the conspiracy of silence that evidences the complicity of the mainstream media's hypocrisy.
The taboo subject is especially relevant to Ron Paul supporters who, unlike Ron Paul, contend the news media has been covering up medical genocide as evidenced in Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola--Nature, Accident or Intentional?, by this author. The book was recommended by Barack Obama's ex-minister, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, on national television with CNN later canceling a prepared segment on the science of the hepatitis B vaccine transmission of HIV to New York's gay and African Black communities.
Instead of following the good pastor's advice, the mainstream media remains bent on spinning or censoring genocide as though the entire topic is a fake or far-fetched.
Classic grist for this rumor mill is the Washington Post's coverage of National Security Memorandum 46.
Casey Lartigue Jr., an education consultant based in Virginia, and Eliot Morgan, a graduate student in environmental science at Harvard University, wrote this article claiming that "one-third of black American churchgoers believed that AIDS was a form of genocide. One-third also believed that HIV was produced in a germ-warfare lab, and 40 percent of black college students in Washington, D.C., agreed."
Real science teaches that Lartique and Morgan's numbers are under-reported. By 1997, more than 60 percent of urban Blacks believed AIDS to be racially-targeted genocide.
Why would The Washington Post lie?
"The Company" is a mouthpiece for the CIA which takes its multinational corporate direction from globalists in London and Berlin. The Washington Post, and the Associated Press, are among the top Anglo-American news (propaganda) sources in the "free world."
Notice, in their article, they cited nothing about the absolutely compelling and condemning evidence on the laboratory creation and vaccine transmission of HIV/AIDS published in Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola--Nature, Accident or Intentional?
Notice they wrote nothing about National Security Memorandum 200 by Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski's counterpart in the Nixon White House, that equally condemns and concerns colored people as targets for genocidal elimination.
Notice they said nothing about George HW Bush standing before Congress in 1968 urging third world, mostly Black, depopulation to allegedly respond to a "U.S. National Security" crisis.
Notice they did not reveal granddaddy Prescott Bush's heavy investment in eugenics, later named "racial hygiene," advanced by the first family's Nazi collaborators (i.e., Rockefeller-Schmitz Standard Oil/IG Farben industrialists).
Notice they failed to detail COINTELPRO under J. Edgar Hoover that specifically targeted Black leaders and organized activists as further detailed in NSM 46.
~ more... ~
