Via NY Transfer News Collective  *  All the News that Doesn't  Fit
 [Much here on the Lockerbie Pan Am 103 scandal and the  conviction
of the Libyan Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi.  
For  much more, see Wikipedia-Watch at 
http://www.wikipedia-watch.org  .
See also these recent articles among others in our archives
-  -NYTransfer] 
Media Conspiracy: Vatican Mucked with Gerry Adams Wikipedia  Entry
http://blythe-systems.com/pipermail/nytr/Week-of-Mon-20070813/066877.htmlMedia  Conspiracy: Wikipedia being edited by CIA, Diebold, politicians?
http://blythe-systems.com/pipermail/nytr/Week-of-Mon-20070813/066812.html                              *
sent by Daniel Brandt - Oct 23, 2007
Wikipedia-Watch
http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/russmag.htmlSpies  in Wikipedia
by Kiwi Bird
Translated from Russian
Published Sep  26, 2007 by Computerra magazine
Original Russian 
http://www.computerra.ru/magazine/333677/In  September of this year, the milestone of two million articles on  the
English-language version of Wikipedia represents an impressive  success
for the global Internet community. This is a grand and,  most
importantly, freely-available source of information about  almost
everything in the world.
However, if Wikipedia reflects the  real world as it is, and given that
modern society includes a high level of  activity on the part of secret
agents, it would be surprising if such agents  ignored the ever-popular
"People's Encyclopedia." And they have not ignored  Wikipedia, but have
tried to spin articles for particular purposes. This  ranges from
varnishing the image of political leaders, to the use of  disinformation
and cover for covert operations.
The interest of  special agents and agencies in influencing Wikipedia
should not surprise  anyone; it is simply a daily part of their official
duties. The scale and  efficiency of their efforts on Wikipedia are not
surprising, but they stun  untrained observers. At the same time, they
reveal to the mass media how  international policy is pursued, and what
stands behind the war against  global terrorism.
Google and other search engines have given Wikipedia  articles high
rankings, often placing them at the top of the listings. It  should be
remembered that the contents of these articles have already  influenced
those who are not adept at pursuing  objectivity.
Identifying SlimVirgin
American professor Ludwig De  Braeckeleer is a nuclear physicist by
profession, who also researches  government abuses of power and human
rights issues. He has been interested in  the Lockerbie disaster for a
long time.
Curious details still surface  today about the bombing in 1988 of a
Boeing 747 over Scotland, which killed  270 people. As more evidence
emerged, those who were following the case  noticed that the
intelligence services of several nations were  implicated.
De Braeckeleer also stumbled across something strange while  searching
the web to prepare an article about Lockerbie. He wanted a source  for
information about the infiltration of PFLP by the Israeli  security
agency Shin Bet. (The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine  -
General Command was an early suspect in the Lockerbie case.)  He
consulted Wikipedia, where he knew the Shin Bet connection had  once
been noted, but there was no longer any trace of that information  in
Wikipedia. The article itself (on Operation Entebbe) had been  blocked
from editing. It is not unusual for disputed articles to be  protected
from editing for certain periods. But normally this still allows  access
to previous versions of the article, as is the case when vandalism  is
reverted, for example. However, this time it was impossible to  recover
the information.  [De Braeckeleer reads better in the original  English
- -ed]
For someone seeking the truth as meticulously as De  Braeckeleer, this
was a red flag signaling that something was not right. The  scientist
began to analyze Wikipedia and its articles on the Lockerbie case  and
the tragic flight of Pan Am 103. This included the unjust, to say  the
least, trial of Libyan Megrahi, who categorically denied his guilt  and
was sentenced to life imprisonment. Despite Wikipedia's  professed
"neutral point of view," all of its articles on the subject  were
clearly biased toward the official viewpoint of the authorities.  In
trying to determine who could be manipulating the facts, De  Braeckeleer
came across a Wikipedia editor who used the pseudonym  "SlimVirgin."
Many Wikipedia editors and administrators prefer to hide  behind screen
names, and sometimes it is not difficult to discover their real  names.
But this was not the case with SlimVirgin. This woman (her gender  has
not been questioned) first appeared in Wikipedia in the Fall of  2004,
and since then has skillfully concealed her identity and  whereabouts.
But she is not famous for that. She quickly understood the  methods of
successful Wikipedia combat (learn the formal rules, and loudly  accuse
opponents of violating the rules, so that an administrator can ban  the
opponent from the debate). SlimVirgin began vigorously editing  articles
within the scope of her interests. Among the first, it must  be
emphasized, were articles about Pan Am 103 and ABC News  journalist
Pierre Salinger, who had investigated the case. SlimVirgin's  editorial
work progressed so well, and she observed the rules so perfectly,  that
she gained the rank of administrator. This gave her the right to  remove
users from the debate and from editing.
Of course, this created  enemies and detractors for SlimVirgin,
including those who had been banned by  her from participating in the
establishment of a "People's Encyclopedia." For  example, a poll in the
famous forum Wikipedia Review awarded SlimVirgin the  dubious title of
"most abusive administrator." At the same time, the numbers  increased
among those who wanted to know the real identity of this cool  and
mysterious woman who was hiding behind the guise of a "lean  virgin."
                     ===== LOCKERBIE ======
"A spectacular miscarriage of justice"
Many  found the verdict of the Scottish judges, who decided that
Abdelbaset Ali  Mohmed Al Megrahi had intentionally caused the death of
270 people, to be  unconvincing and unfair. The international observer
appointed by the United  Nations, professor Hans Koechler, called the
decision a "spectacular  miscarriage of justice." He elaborated on the
inconsistencies and  questionable evidence against Megrahi.
The "Libyan connection" had been  questioned from the beginning, and
many demanded a new, independent  investigation. However, all British
prime ministers, including Thatcher,  Major, and Blair, spared no effort
to block such an investigation.  Nevertheless, in 2005 a Scottish
appeals court began a procedure for  reviewing the case, and so far
there is substantial information suggesting  that U.S. and British
intelligence agencies forged evidence against Libya in  order to isolate
that country. In particular, one of the key pieces of  evidence in the
case against Libya -- a fragment from a printed circuit board  of a
timer fuse -- was planted by CIA employees, according to the  testimony
of a Scottish policeman. And engineer Ulrich Lumpert, from the  Swiss
firm Mebo that produced timers ordered by the Libyan army,  recently
admitted that he secretly provided a counterfeit board at the  request
of American intelligence.
But if evidence of Libya's guilt was  fabricated, then who blew up the
plane? Immediately after the disaster, Pan  American Airlines hired the
detective firm Interfor, headed by Juval Aviv, a  former
Israeli-intelligence Mossad operative. Aviv quickly discovered that  Pan
Am flight 103 from Europe to America regularly carried heroin.  This
channel for Syrian traffickers was covered up by the CIA in  exchange
for intelligence on Palestinian militant groups in Syria. On the day  of
the disaster, everything went wrong: terrorists who knew about  the
channel replaced the suitcase containing drugs, which avoided  security
screening, with a suitcase containing explosives. This version  of
events was confirmed in 1990 by former Defense Intelligence  Agency
operative Lester Coleman, who described Syrian cooperation with  U.S.
intelligence services. After writing his book Trail of the  Octopus,
Coleman was under severe legal pressure from U.S. security services.  He
had to go into hiding and request asylum in Sweden, and became  the
first American political refugee since the Vietnam  War.
                        =====================
Next came a massive Internet hunt for bits of  information that could
shed light on the mystery of SlimVirgin. The key role  in her
identification was played by American researcher Daniel Brandt,  known
for his site Wikipedia-Watch.org. He is also known for  revelations
about misinformation published in Wikipedia about the  Kennedy
assassination (the Seigenthaler case), as well as the identification  of
another administrator. This was a professor of theology with  two
doctorates named Essjay, who turned out to be an ambitious  young
imposter named Ryan Jordan. The story of the painstaking  investigation
of the SlimVirgin case would make a good chapter in a spy  novel, but we
will go to the end because it is more interesting.
The  consistency and credibility of the collected evidence leaves no
doubt that  SlimVirgin is the screen name chosen by Linda Mack, now
living in Canada  under the name Sarah McEwan. In the 1980s she was a
student in the philosophy  department at Cambridge University. She
participated as a journalist in the  investigation of the Lockerbie
attack, while playing an active role as an  organizer of some close
relatives of the victims. Due to a series of events,  strong suspicions
arose concerning Linda Mack's close links to the British  security
service MI5, causing her to disappear from sight for a long time.  Years
later she surfaced in the Canadian province of Alberta under the  name
Sarah McEwan. Her email address (
slimvirgin1@yahoo.com) was the  same
address that Cambridge showed for Linda Mack in its list of  alumni.
The most important evidence was an involuntary confession by  SlimVirgin
that she was Linda Mack. In the early 1990s, American journalist  John K.
Cooley worked with Pierre Salinger at the London bureau of ABC  News,
and was involved with the investigation of Lockerbie. In his email  to
Brandt, he described how they hired an impressive and energetic  Linda
Mack, who was eager to investigate the bombing. But after a while  it
became clear that Linda was trying to push journalists toward  the
official version of the story that accused Libya. It wasn't long  before
a special unit of Scotland Yard raided ABC News and seized  certain
materials. Because only a few people knew about the seized  material,
Salinger realized that this was the work of Linda Mack, and he  locked
her out of her office. ABC's efforts to fight the seizure  were
unsuccessful in court. Daniel Brandt had already announced  the
identification of SlimVirgin as Linda Mack publicly, and she knew  that
he was about to ask John Cooley for information. She called Cooley as  a
former colleague and asked him not to speak to Brandt. But her  request
was late -- an email from Cooley to Brandt had already been  sent.
These events occurred in Fall 2006. At that time almost no one  was
interested in the identification of SlimVirgin, except for  regular
visitors to the web forum Wikipedia Review [1]. But at the end of  July
2007, the above-mentioned professor Ludwig De Braeckeleer published  his
article "Wikipedia and the Intelligence Services" at the South  Korean
"civic journalism" site OhmyNews [2]. He briefly recapped the  key
points about the "People's Encyclopedia." This article was picked up  by
the very popular forum Slashdot[3]. Because of that, the  OhmyNews
article was read by 50,000 people in three days.
Reaction to  leaks
Whenever the work of intelligence services is punctured, the  most
important information for analysis appears in the first days and  hours
after the event. Those who know something inadvertently  reveal
superfluous information, while those who are directly involved  are
either keeping silent, or refute everything through quick and  flagrant
misinformation. In the case of Linda Mack, it is impossible  to
determine who knew what in the upper echelon of Wikipedia, but  their
reaction fits all the characteristics of espionage  leaks.
SlimVirgin slipped into a state of unconsciousness and has not  shown
any signs of life for thirty hours. This is very unusual, because  she
is known as an administrator with inhuman capacity for work. Over  the
past year, she edited nearly 35,000 articles (about 100 every  day,
without holidays and weekends). The same SlimVirgin also holds a  record
of continuous editorial work lasting 26 hours, with the longest  break
in editing not exceeding 40 minutes. These statistics from  Wikipedia's
editing records suggests either a supernatural ability, or more  likely
that SlimVirgin is a convenient smoke screen for an entire team  of
specialists editing Wikipedia articles on behalf of  intelligence
services.
The "god-king" of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales,  rushed to protect the honor
and dignity of SlimVirgin, declaring the article  by De Braeckeleer as
"really spectacular nonsense." A bit later in a special  message to
readers of Slashdot, he stated:
"This story is demented and  broken on so many levels, it is quite
difficult to know where to begin, even.  Here we have an excellent
Wikipedia administrator who has been victimized by  lunatic conspiracy
theorists, a private person who has absolutely no relation  to the wild
stories that this article promulgates. Slashdot, you have been  trolled."
But participants in the discussion were able to prove from the  records
of Wikipedia that certain administrators, contrary to their own  rules,
had completely removed editing evidence. Jimmy Wales had to admit  that
yes, this is sometimes done, but only to protect the identity  of
administrators or editors, who are often threatened with  physical
violence.
             ======== Wikipedia and its rules ========
Like any online community,  Wikipedia follows certain rules of conduct.
But because Wikipedia is a  rather contradictory combination of normal
encyclopedia, panel discussions,  and role-fantasy games, the rules are
intricate and ambiguous. For example,  everyone knows the famous motto,
"The encyclopedia that anyone can edit." But  in fact, anyone who wants
to fix or add something has to be liked by the  administrator who is in
charge of that topic.
According to basic rules  of Wikipedia, the articles should reflect the
"neutral point of view."  However, some points of view are always more
neutral than others. One's point  of view (POV) should be supported by
sources that are "verifiable" and  "reliable" -- although "reliable" is
a constant subject of fierce disputes.  But there is a clear taboo
against "original research," which are opinions  that are not supported
by recognized authority.
Editing and overall  policy in Wikipedia is conducted on the basis of
"consensus." In practice  this means approximately the following: there
can be only one successful  editor who is able, through flattery or
threats, to persuade the others. If  someone wants to simply edit the
encyclopedia, he or she will quickly come  into conflict with more
aggressive editors. That will end first with a  temporary, and then a
total ban on participation.
The highest level of  the Wikipedia hierarchy is called The Cabal, or
Clique. Becoming a member of  the Clique means that one has
unprecedented authority, including the right to  ignore the rules. But
to achieve such power, a person has to sell one's soul  to the devil by
renouncing one's own views, and accepting the viewpoint of  the Clique.
According to the head of Wikipedia, Jimbo Wales, The Cabal  represents
the power of "some shadowy mysterious elite group of us to do  things
that might not be possible for newbies."
- -from a satirical  essay 
http://www.geocities.com/Berlet_archive/virgin.htm                                ======================
The most curious reaction to the news of  SlimVirgin's identity was
demonstrated by the English-language media: apart  from personal blogs
and web forums, not a single word appeared in any of the  major media!
Previous scandals such the Seigenthaler case, exposing Essjay,  and the
WikiScanner program by Virgil Griffith, received wide coverage.  But
there was silence about SlimVirgin, comparable to the silence  on
classic themes such as UFOs and the assassination of John F.  Kennedy.
This year such themes have been completely ignored by major  media, even
when new light is shed on these twentieth-century mysteries.  First the
famous E. Howard Hunt, who personally participated in many  covert
operations during the 1950s and 1960s, admitted before he died that  the
assassination of President Kennedy was organized by U.S.  intelligence,
in conjunction with the Mafia and top administration officials,  headed
by Vice-President Lyndon Johnson. Several months later a  notarized
deathbed confession by Walter Haut was published. In 1947 he was  the
public relations officer at the 509th Bomb Group based in Roswell,  New
Mexico. First he composed a press release about the crash of a  flying
disc, and soon followed with a new release about a weather balloon.  For
the rest of his life he gave evasive explanations of what was  really
found, but just before he died he dared to tell the truth.
In  the document he left behind, Walter Haut states that he not only saw
the  wrecked spacecraft, but also the bodies of aliens recovered from
it. They had  unusually large heads, and bodies the size of a
ten-year-old child. It is  clear that the deathbed confessions of people
who participated in these  extraordinary events deserve serious
attention. But the major media ignored  both of them.
Moreover, the sensational confession of E. Howard Hunt did  not even get
any space in Wikipedia's article on the assassination of John  F.
Kennedy (at least it is mentioned in the article on E. Howard  Hunt).
The confession of Walter Haut is reflected in the article about  the
Roswell incident, but it lacks a direct reference to the  document
published on the web. Thus, the conclusion: for important  Wikipedia
articles, the content is gradually approaching the official  information
available from traditional sources. It is more or less  understandable
who is behind this. Everyone must decide for himself or  herself whether
this is acceptable.
End Notes:
[1] 
http://wikipediareview.com/[2]http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?at_code=424653
[3]  
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/27/1943254