"These capitalists  generally act harmoniously and in concert to fleece the people, and now that  they have got into a quarrel with themselves, we are called upon to appropriate  the people's money to settle the quarrel." – Abraham Lincoln, speech to Illinois  legislature, January 1837
 
 In July, Treasury Secretary  Henry Paulson said of his massive underwriting scheme for Fannie Mae and Freddie  Mac, "If you have a bazooka in your pocket and people know it, you probably  won't have to use it."  On September 7, Paulson pulled out his  bazooka and fired, effectively nationalizing the mortgage giants.   Last week, Paulson pulled out the bazooka again and held it to Congress's  head.  "Seven hundred billion dollars or your credit system  will collapse!"  Seven hundred billion dollars is more than  the country currently pays annually for Social Security; and for what do we owe  this ransom?  To bail out bankers from their own folly in  speculating in a giant derivative Ponzi scheme that is now  imploding.  But policymakers justify rewarding the guilty  parties at the expense of the taxpayers by arguing that "we have to do it to  save the banking system." 
  
 Abraham Lincoln was faced with  a similar situation when he stepped into the Presidency in 1861.   The country was suddenly in a civil war, and there was insufficient money  to fund it.  The British bankers, knowing they had him over a  barrel, agreed to lend him money only at 24 to 36% interest, highly usurious  rates that would have bankrupted the North.  Our fearless  forefather said, "Thanks but no thanks, I'll print my own."   Issuing the national currency is the sovereign right of  governments.  A government does not need to borrow its  national currency from bankers "merely pretending to have money."   That was the phrase used by Thomas Jefferson when he realized the  bankers' "fractional reserve" lending scheme meant that they were lending the  same "reserves" many times over.  
  
 The federal dollars issued by  Lincoln were called U.S. Notes or Greenbacks.  They allowed  the North not only to win the Civil War but to create the greatest industrial  giant the world had ever seen.  Lincoln's government launched  the steel industry, created a continental railroad system, promoted a new era of  farm machinery and cheap tools, established free higher education, provided  government support to all branches of science, organized the Bureau of Mines,  increased labor productivity by 50 to 75 percent.  The  Greenback was not the only currency used to fund these achievements; but they  could not have been accomplished without it, and they could not have been  accomplished on money borrowed at 30% interest.
  
 There are other historical  examples.  In the 1930s, Australia and New Zealand avoided the  Depression conditions suffered elsewhere by drawing on a national credit card  issued by publicly-owned central banks.  The governments of  the island states of Guernsey and Jersey have been issuing their own money for  two centuries, creating thriving economies without carrying federal  debt.  
  
 In none of these models has  government-issued money created dangerous price inflation.   Price inflation results either when the supply of money goes up but the  supply of goods doesn't, or when speculators crash currencies by massive short  selling, as in those cases of Latin American hyperinflation when printing-press  money was used to pay off foreign debt.  When new money is  used to produce new goods and services, price inflation does not result because  supply and demand rise together.  Prices increased during the  American Civil War, but this was attributed to the scarcity of goods common in  wartime.  War produces weapons rather than consumer  goods.
  
 Today in most countries, money  is created privately by banks when they make loans; but the banks create only  the principal, not the interest necessary to pay the loans back.   The interest must be borrowed into existence, continually increasing the  money supply, in a Ponzi scheme that has reached its mathematical  limits.  The latest desperate proposal for propping up this  collapsing system is to deliver $700 billion of taxpayer money to ex-Goldman  Sachs CEO Henry Paulson to buy unmarketable derivative paper from the banks,  shifting the loss on this dodgy paper from the banks to the  taxpayers.  Seven hundred billion is just the opening figure;  losses on the imploding derivatives pyramid could wind up being in the  trillions.  And where will this money come from?   It will no doubt be borrowed into existence from the banking  system.  We the people will be in the anomalous position of  paying interest on a debt to the banks to bail out the banks!   At the very least, doesn't it seem that the banks should be paying  interest on the $700 billion to us?
  
 Rather than propping up an  unsustainable system with taxpayer money, it may be time to let the private  money-making scheme collapse and replace it with something better.   Banks that have thrived in an unregulated free market should be left to  work out their fates in that market.  If they go bankrupt,  they can be put into receivership and reorganized in return for an equity  interest in the banks, as was done recently with AIG.  The  government would then own a string of banks, which could issue "the full faith  and credit of the United States" directly, returning the country to productivity  and prosperity just as Lincoln did. 
  
 As for the derivatives mess,  there may be some derivatives that serve useful market functions, but most of  them should be declared an illegal form of gambling and void.   Neither party would owe on the deal; the bets would cancel each other  out.  True, dodgy assets transformed into "triple-A"  investments by fake derivative insurance would lose that rating; but they  aren't triple-A investments, and the pension funds now holding them  should dump them.  The downgrades could wreak havoc on  the balance sheets of some banks, but that's the free market.   If they go bankrupt and we the people have to bail them out, we should do  it only in return for adequate  quid pro quo in the  form of their stock.  Like Lincoln, we should say "Thanks but  no thanks" to Paulson's $700 billion ransom.
  
 Ellen  Brown, J.D., developed her research skills as an attorney practicing  civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns  those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and "the money trust." She  shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the  people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her eleven books  include the bestselling Nature's Pharmacy, co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker,  and Forbidden Medicine.  Her websites are www.webofdebt.com and  www.ellenbrown.com.  
  
 ~ The  Centre for Research on Globalization ~