[or, How the lesson of the Soviet downfall bounced off tin heads]
  
 " ... Perhaps a little premature yet it appears that the US  military-industrial machine is attempting to enclose the global open system; to  transform it and enmesh it within a closed system of total information  awareness; to cover, track, and gaze omnisciently over all flows, mobilities,  and transactions. It is a move towards a total system, an attempt to gain  some degree of mastery over the unpredictability of global flows through the  core component of dominating informational flows. As part of this project the US  military are currently establishing a linkage of satellites into what has been  dubbed the military 'Internet in the sky', which will form part of their secure  informational network named as the Global Information Grid, or GIG (Weiner,  2004). First conceived in 1998, and now in construction, $200 billion has  already been estimated as a cost for both the hardware and software (Weiner,  2004). This war-net, as the military also term it, forms the core of the US  military's move towards appropriating network-centric warfare (Arquilla and  Ronfeldt, 2001a; Arquilla and Ronfeldt, 2001b; Dickey,  2004; Weiner, 2004). The chief information officer at the US Defense  Department was noted for saying that 'net-centric principles were becoming "the  centre of gravity" for war planners' (Weiner, 2004). Some of the names of the  military contractors involved in this project include Boeing; Cisco Systems,  Hewlett-Packard; IBM; Lockheed Martin; Microsoft; Raytheon; and Sun Microsystems  (Weiner, 2004). As part of this complete coverage – or 'full spectrum dominance'  – the US military hopes to be able to communicate and control an increasing  arsenal of unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs),  integrated into what they are calling the 'Multimedia Intelligent Network of  Unattended Mobile Agents' (Minuteman). This in turn is part of a larger military  project on Intelligent Autonomous Agent Systems (Science-Daily, 2002).
  Recently, a document entitled Information Operation  Roadmap was declassified by the Pentagon and made public by the  National Security Archive on January 26, 2006. According to this document the  term 'information operations' includes 
 The integrated employment of the core capabilities of  Electronic Warfare, Computer Network Operations, Psychological Operations,  Military Deception and Operations Security, in concert with specified supporting  and related capabilities, to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial  human and automated decisions-making while protecting our own. (DoD, 2003:  22)
 The document continues by outlining how the US military needs  to secure a future electromagnetic capability 'sufficient to provide maximum  control of the entire electromagnetic spectrum, denying, degrading, disrupting,  or destroying the full spectrum of globally emerging communication systems,  sensors, and weapons systems dependant on the electromagnetic spectrum' (DoD,  2003: 61). Clearly, the recommendation here is for developing, and extending,  current capabilities in order to have full and complete dominance over all  globally emerging telecommunications and their hardware.
 [ ... ]
 The development of increasingly sentient 'smart' environments  will go some way towards creating a more systemic relationship of  interconnections and interdependencies between humans, objects/machines, and  locality. This possibility has led some commentators to speak of an emerging  cybernomadic landscape (Saveri, 2004). Here, the emphasis is on an embedded  sensory world that will influence and fundamentally alter social practices. Such  a cybernomadic landscape has been defined, in a recent IFTF report, by three  primary forces of physical-digital fusion; the augmented self; and digitally  catalysed masses (Saveri, 2004: 2). Similarly, De Rosnay sees this future as a  form of symbiotic humanity: 'each person functions as a node in this  hypernetwork. Symbiotic humanity is both the totality of the network and one of  its elements; it exists through the network and the network exists only through  it' (de Rosnay, 2000: 143). In all cases it involves networking with,  utilizing, and interacting with objects, something which futurist and author  Bruce Sterling refers to as a 'synchronic society':
 A synchronic society generates trillions of catalogable,  searchable, trackable trajectories…Embedded in a monitored space and time and  wrapped in a haze of process, no object stands alone; it is not a static thing,  but a shaping-thing. (Sterling, 2005: 50) ... "