'It could be survivable. It could be even worse.'

From: Toward Deep Waters - Part II (The Second of a Two Part Essay on Webster G. Tarpley's New Book, Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography)

Anyone who's been following things knows the time is ripe. Like the dollar, the economy itself is reeling, about to expire. The stage is set with a masterly and unprecedentedly elaborate perfection. Set, you ask? For what?

Well, set for change, my darlings. But it's unlikely to be the kind, I'm afraid, that will make you feel hopeful and warm and fuzzy just by believing in it.

There's a chance that by February we'll be spending — if we have any, and if they're worth anything — Ameros instead of dollars. And there's a chance that the United States won't be a sovereign republic any longer but instead the middle part of the "North American Union," a huge body made up of Mexico, the U.S., and Canada — all using Ameros. If they've got any of them, that is, and if they're worth anything.

I'm not claiming that any such thing is going to happen. I'm saying that there's a good chance of it.

We mustn't forget — excepting the millions who never did admit it — that we're dealing with "leaders" sufficiently monstrous, greedy, and criminal to have carefully and cold-bloodedly planned and executed 9/11 from A to Z. Why'd they do it? Because they wanted war in order to make a hegemonic grab for the world's oil and gas — and because they wanted a way to terrorize the American people badly enough that said people would give up their Constitutional rights and freedoms without the least whimper or complaint, in fact eagerly, all the better for the imposition of a police state if that were to prove useful in the fulfillment of the Napoleonically sweeping crimes that the murders, torturers, and traitors were in the process of committing. The concentration camps are ready. Northcom is in place to surveil and control us all, and the weaponry to be used on us is at the ready. On the "diplomatic" side, there have been, since 2005, five summit meetings of the Mexican, American, and Canadian heads of state to discuss and arrange details for creating the North American Union (a bit like the European Union, except just imposed — get it?), and the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America has been brought into existence to smooth the way. On the other hand, the usurpation of U.S. sovereignty by the bloodless criminals who've been in charge for the last fifteen or twenty years could begin in some other way than through the sudden imposition of the North American Union. It could, say, take the form of a nuclear attack on a well-chosen American city or two, or three — since that's all planned out, too — with martial law to be declared afterward as an expedient way to bring order out of the resulting panic and mayhem. Or the usurpation of national sovereignty could be brought about by the deliberate collapsing of the entire American economy, something that, as the past few months have proven, the American people overwhelmingly support — they having done absolutely nothing since at least 2000 to prevent it or to bar their "leaders" from doing it. Even the new Nobelist, Paul Krugman, still insists upon continuing to talk about "incompetence" in the handling of the nation's — and now the world's — "economy." May I be pardoned for saying to the new prize-winner, or I should say for asking of him, "Duh"?

If you'd like to read a very small handful of letters — one of them very, very brilliant indeed — on the subject of "incompetence" versus "planned destruction," click here — but be sure to come right back.