Why the West ignores the looming China threat

Lev Navrozov emigrated from the Soviet Union in 1972 He settled in New York City where he quickly learned that there was no market for his eloquent and powerful English language attacks on the Soviet Union. To this day, he writes without fear or favor or the conventions of polite society. He chaired the "Alternative to the New York Times Committee" in 1980, challenged the editors of the New York Times to a debate (which they declined) and became a columnist for the New York City Tribune. His columns are today read in both English and Russian.

"Accuracy in Media" (for which I once wrote) had been created to correct the biases of the U.S. media. Thus, the bias of the U.S. media today is to minimize the catastrophic military threat from China to the USA (and hence to the free world in general). Accordingly, on March 4, 2008, "Accuracy in Media" printed the article "The Threat from China and the Threat from Inaction: Which Is Worse?" The author? Not a government or university spokesman: George W. Bush and the three presidential candidates have been maintaining total silence about the threat from China as well as the U.S. inaction concerning this threat.

The author of the article is collective: editors of "Family Security Matters.org." They have been taking care of the security of the family and could well be expected to be sensitive to the conquest of the free world by the dictatorship of China, which has been torturing people to death for "wrong" physical exercises.

The authors' reference to "the threat from inaction" is appropriate: China's military strategy (see the Chinese military book "Unrestricted Warfare") is based on deception and hence on the surprise of the attack.

The situation is catastrophic: it resembles the situation in Chamberlain's Britain in 1938. Chamberlain's glorious achievement was his gift of part of Czechoslovakia to Hitler in exchange for a piece of paper signed by Hitler as a peace agreement. If Hitler had been riding through London with Chamberlain in 1938, after their "peace agreement," there is no doubt that the Londoners would have greeted Hitler as they did Chamberlain. But Hitler was a fool (he became the "Leader" since his Reichstag party received a majority vote because it was against the Treaty of Versailles). So Hitler invaded the remainder of Czechoslovakia, then Poland and then France and thus made himself the worst enemy of the civilized world.

Compare today's behavior of the dictatorship of China with respect to Taiwan, which even some Chinese dissidents consider it necessary to make part of China by force.

A catastrophic threat to the free world today is the threat from inaction, as in Britain in 1938. Why this inaction?

~ read on... ~