" ... Of course, in universe nothing is simple, and in this case it is the mind numbingly complex nature of bizzillions of events all interacting which create the problems. As noted in the graphic below, *all events* send out waves in the pre-creation force, and thus all are creating 'pulse points'.
So, the poor observer gets a view of the future which resembles the jumble seen in the next graphic.
This view of patterns within patterns all interfering with each other is what makes future prediction an art.
At this point within the series, the processing patterns themselves are revealing. We note that at a meta art level, the manner in which the data types are accruing and to which entities is itself revealing of the large scale changes to manifest over the course of this year. We note that accretion patterns are heavily favoring large scale natural disaster, as well as the 'space contact' meme. Further, the 'revolution' meta data layers are growing in all entities, and may be forming a tipping point around our current target date of October, 2008. Further layers of 'revolution' are forming in sub sets across all the sciences, and within areas such as the military, and the TPTB, new contexts are being exposed within these patterns. The multiplicity of cross links continues to expand, both in the number of entities involved in any given context, as well as the depth of supporting layers of aspect/attribute sets.
At this point in the processing of all the data types (immediacy values, shorter term values, and longer term sets), the patterns of accrual are largest around 3/three central memes: dollar death, natural disasters, and 'space energies'. All three have very high visibility summations, as well as multiple points within multiple entities where [manifestation] is set to occur.
Of course, none of this helps with the details. As the complexity of filtering out language grows over time due to language itself changing, there are also problems presented by being able to note such changes at lower levels of granularity. At these levels where it may be suspected that some details might be located, it becomes even more apparent that details do not always suffice to explain the events.
This will be especially true in 2008. The detail layers suggest vast changes across the whole of the social order on this planet. And on other planets in our solar system as well. Leaving our solar neighbors out of the picture for just now, the details suggest that meta data levels of activity here on Terra will combine to produce alterations at such levels as to affect *all* of daily life in this next year. It will start and end with food production. From large scale changes in weather/climate patterns which will devastate the growing of food crops, to coast changes growing in [presence/affect] over the year, the [planet in peril] meme will dominate. Other impacts on food production will come from the expanding [dollar death] meme, and its impact on energy costs, and thus food supplies globally. Further impacts on all other parts of the social order will be felt as well.
It is possible to lift out whole layers of meaning from the concealing jumble of the patterns of the pre-creation ripples from future events. Now we can note that the very last gasp effort of the 'dominator' culture will be expressed over 2008 and 2009. These 'control freaks' otherwise variously described as 'illuminati', and 'cabal', and 'Bilderbergers', are going to be using *every* effort, that is to say, *all* their energy over these next 2/two years to attempt to [restrain] the [loss of control] which are implied by emerging future patterns. That the effort is doomed to fail will not deter them from wasting vast quantities of the planet's dwindling resources in the attempt. They are truly desperate people now. And the data sets point to the [desperation] rising at a very rapid rate from the [vernal equinox, spring] onward.
The modelspace that we use here at HPH suggests that 2008 will be a very interesting year indeed. ... "
~ From Half Past Human - Adventures in Future Viewing ~
Replaying 1929?
From columns around: July 7-15, 2001
Background: Sometime in early July 2001, I was contacted by a fellow who wrote in as a reader of the web site, who is a principal in a think tank that works on esoteric ways to out think the market. One of the approaches used was to send a lot of web bots out to look at thousands of lines of detail on the web every day, do pattern and word recognition, then send back the results, which were then tabulated in an extremely complex modeling program that is so complex, simple engines like Excel could not handle it. Instead, the group used IntelliCad, a program called Prolog, and some LISP code to come up with a "tipping point" model. The following are the comments on the site and reports about the experiment, which include a description of how this very web site managed to "pollute" the model, rendering it useless just a few iterations after it was reported on this site.
Urban Survival Readers Implode Think Tank Model:
Model Prediction: Will the Markets Now Move?
It will be several hours before the after-hours markets open, but when they do, we will see over the following 2-months, whether a highly sophisticated computer model accurately forecast events to come in the financial markets. If you haven't been reading this site on a daily basis, on Wednesday I posted an update forecasting a "tipping point" event this weekend. That work was later upgraded to a major market warning by week's end. On Saturday, I posted that there was a good chance the Star Wars missile test would be the "tipping point".
Before we get into a detailed discussion of the events of this weekend, let me first show you how "tipping point" theory works in complex systems theory.
A "tipping point" occurs when events from the future pass some mathematical point, where the general direction of many future events changes based on the events in the past that lead up to it.
OK, now that you see how the basic mechanism works, the next step in understanding how the much larger model works is to picture what happens when you put lots of these event models into a huge array updated daily over many months. I like to picture it this way: Take a building, tip it over, and as the frequency of points in a "scatter chart" begins to thicken, you get the emergence of something called "entities". An entity might look something like this:
Before (and as) the bluish entity appears, along the dark area, events thicken up, congealing into the entity.
And, after the event (such as the one projected for this weekend), the entity may either continue to grow, or, as events from other sectors of life unfold, the entity disperses over time.
The way the model "ends" will depend on the type of event. Sometimes, the end point (right side of the entity) just sort of dissolves. Other times, the entity continues growing.
What made the entity that the think tank was tracking so interested was that it showed a major tipping point event this weekend, and among the thousands of data points, the model was showing specific highlighted areas of the world, and certain aspects.
Now that we are past the tipping point, it appears that the output from the model may, and I emphasize the word may, have been pointing toward the Star Wars missile test that occurred (unknown to me when the model was posted Wednesday) precisely within the time specified.
Now that the Star Wars project has scored a direct hit, the question is "If this was the tipping point event, how does it change the future in such a way that it will cause a massive change in the markets?" That my friend is precisely the right question to be asking. Let's consider, in a schematic kind of way, what the success of the missile test might mean, over the next two or three years.
If the missile test really is the tipping point, that means we can fill in a box as being "missile test successful". And in the drawing, I have colored this box yellow. With me?
OK, concurrently, the worldwide arms race equilibrium is relatively stable. The caveat here is that it "appears" to be stable. There may be a lot of destabilizing things going on that are below the public's perception threshold, but it seems fairly stable.
Now that the missile test is gone, and the "shot to kill" technology may be working, that will almost certainly lead to the U.S. unilaterally abrogating the ABM treaty. (sorry about the spelling error!)
This in turn causes global uncertainty to develop over the coming months.
And this, in turn potentially puts the world into a very high risk arena. We might see, for example, the People's Republic of China launch a move against Taiwan in the near future, because the longer they wait, the less deterrence their long range missiles will have. If the U.S. becomes an unbreachable fortress from a strategic weapons standpoint, then any potential aggressor now has a major incentive to move sooner, rather than later. Why wait for the U.S. to get "stronger"?
Of course, once the systems are deployed, if the development gets that far, then the risk mode reverses: The U.S. gains a worldwide strategic one-up. Unfortunately, the success of the test has not passed un-noticed to major players like Russia and China. It is sure to bring consequences in terms of how global development takes place. The tipping point theory doesn't predict the specific outputs or pinpoint individual events, but again, getting back to the model, it is forecasting an all-time low of the Dow around 463 on November 8th, 2002.
Whether the world gets past the "risk zone" unscathed becomes the nexus of just one aspect of tipping point problems. Could there also be another tipping point, less obvious than the missile test success? Sure. But does the reigniting of a worldwide arms race have the potential to change markets? Of course. Howard Hill checked in and reported that although the players seem locked, at least Friday, the spreads surrounding South America's mess (Argentina et al) do not appear to warn of an impending breakdown there. This would have been another tipping point possibility...
~ from Urban Survival ~
No comments:
Post a Comment